All of us know, that our favourite Gossip Girl TV-Series is based on a book-series. Probably everyone of us read comments from other Gossip Girl fans saying: “That’s _so not what happened in the book!” – But what exactly are the differences?
I gathered some rather weird differences – and since I never read the books, they where quite surprising!
Here you go:
In the books, Serenas sibling Erik (spelled Eric in TV series) is three years older, heterosexual,
and attends Brown University; in the TV series, he’s younger (two years), a high school student, and gay.
In the books, Serena’s parents are still married and her mother, Lilian, never spoke to Dan Humphrey’s father, let alone dated him; In the TV series, Serena’s mom dated Dan’s father, Rufus.
In the books, when Serena returns, she still wants to party and have things return to normal. In the TV series, Serena is focused on changing and becoming a better person.
In the books, Serena left because her parents wanted her to and because she had sex with Nate and because she realized that what she had done could really hurt both Blair and Nate, and even herself. In the TV show, she left because on the night she slept with Nate, she offered cocaine to a guy that she was fooling around with, and he died. The death was caught on tape by Georgina, who had secretly set up a camera so as to film Serena having sex.
In the books, Serena and Nate were in love before he and Blair ever hooked up, and before they had sex. In the series, it is suggested that Serena and Nate only had Sex because they were drunk at the wedding.
In the books, Blair and Serena have romantic and sexual exchanges. In the TV show, no such relationship is portrayed.
Serena’s relationship with Dan is very brief in the book series; in the TV series, it is longer and more serious.
In the books, Serena and Nate have sex after Serena returns to the city from her holidays because Nate asked her to, with the intention of them hooking up. They had sex in Nate’s parents’ bed, in the Archibald residence, in private. In the series, after the two got drunk at a wedding, had sex in a deserted bar. Chuck also witnessed this from a balcony.
In the books, Chuck is bisexual whereas in the TV series he is thus far heterosexual.
In the books, Chuck attends Riverside Prep on the Upper West Side with Dan Humphrey, while Nate attends St. Jude’s; on the show, all three attend St. Jude’s.
In the books, Chuck never actually keeps a girlfriend, and only sleeps around; on the show he develops serious feelings for Blair, and by the end of season one has fallen in love with her.
In the books, Nate despises Chuck; on the show they are best friends. In “Seventeen Candles” Chuck tells Nate that “[he cares] about three things… Money, the pleasures money brings [him], and you [Nate].”
In the books, he has a brother named Donald Bass and a cousin named Harold aka Harry Bass; he has no siblings on the show.
In the books, Chuck’s parents are Bart and Misty Bass; while Chuck mentions his dead mother only during the pilot episode,’The Serena Also Rises’,and ‘Bonfire Of Vanity’.
In the books, Chuck is simply tolerated by the other main characters; on the show he has three best friends – Nate, Blair (who he eventually falls for), and Serena (who eventually becomes his stepsister). He also becomes good friends with his stepbrother, Eric.
In the book series, Vanessa has a shaved head, wears all black attire, and is slightly overweight; in the TV series she is curly-haired and slender, and is mostly styled in boho chic.
In the book series, Vanessa loses her virginity to a guy who works at the club her sister Ruby plays at; they also dated briefly. In the TV series she has yet to lose her virginity.
In the book series, Vanessa’s sister Ruby is a prominent character; in the TV series Ruby is only briefly mentioned as being in a lesbian punk band.
In the book series, Vanessa attends Constance Billard on scholarship. In the TV series, she is home-schooled.
Nate’s two best friends in the books are Serena and Blair, while also hanging out with boys named Anthony, Charlie and Jeremy. He also couldn’t stand Chuck. In the TV series, Chuck is Nate’s best friend.
Nate struggles with drugs in the book, even being sent to rehab, but in the show Nate’s father has the addiction. Although, Nate’s drug of choice is marijuana while his father’s is cocaine.
Nate met Georgina at rehab and they both dated, whereas in the series they knew each other through mutual aquaintances.
The books revolve around the love of Blair and Nate, whereas the series portrays the two as dating several other people as well.
In the books Nate doesn’t date Vanessa, while in the TV series the two have deep feelings for each other.
In the book series, Dan is described as shaggy, unshaven most of the time, and kind of “nerdy”. In the TV series, he has very short hair and is clean shaven.
In the book series, Dan loses his virginity to Vanessa; in the TV series he loses it to Serena.
In the book series Dan was a heavy smoker; in the TV series he doesn’t smoke at all.
In the book series, he wasn’t long time best friends with Vanessa Abrams, since in the books she just moved to NYC from Vermont when she was 15, he is disinterested in her in the first book, because he’s always eyed socialite Serena van der Woodsen.
In the book series, Dan briefly experimented with his sexuality by dating a man. In season one of the television series, he only dates Serena van der Woodsen and sees Georgina Sparks.
In the book Jenny has a large chest, which draws the attention of many boys and is the bane of Jenny’s existence, particularly when she is sexually assaulted by Chuck Bass. Jenny is described as having curly brown hair and brown eyes. She is just under 5 feet.
In the books, Blair Waldorf is the main character, on the TV-Show it seems as if Serena helds this position.
She loses her virginity to Nate in the book, while in the series she loses it to Chuck.
In the books, Blair has a younger brother named Tyler, whereas, in the TV series, she is an only child.
Blair lived at The Plaza Hotel, in Williamsburg, Brooklyn with Vanessa Abrams, and in the original apartment where Breakfast at Tiffany’s was shot with BFF Serena, in designer Bailey Winter’s East Hampton summer home, and the Yale Club of New York City. – In the TV-Series Blair would never move in with Vanessa.
Most differences found @ wikipedia
Did you guys notice any other differences?
What do you think about the differences? Would you’ve preferred it if they had stick to the facts from the book?
I’m glad they didn’t stick to them as tightly. I wouldn’t want another TV-Series like “Queer as folk”. But I would love to see Vanessa with a shaved head & Dan as a smoker (not that that’s a good thing, it’s just that it’d fit his character. imo.)
I think vanessa would be a much better character if they had stuck with how the books described her: shaved head, wearing all black, kick ass attitude. in the tv series she’s kinda boring…
but overall i think i prefer the tv series (and i have read the books)
blair + chuck = perfection
xxx
Well, judging by what was edited or left out from the books (drugs, homosexuality) it seems that certain changes had to have been made to the original story to make it more “suitable” for a younger audience by today’s television standards. That raises the question though, is it ok to expose our children to a world, imaginary or not, where there are very few or fairly light consequences for outlandish and irreverant behavior? Seems like much of the dirt was scrubbed from the storyline on purpose. That’s just one man’s opinion though…thoughts?
I agree with kiko. On every single point mentioned, I prefer the TV show’s interpretation, especially with Chuck. He seems WAY more interesting on the show as he is not so one-dimensional.
im completly in love with chuck(ed westwick) i think that hes the best acter in the whole world!!!!!!! he’s sexy as helllllllllllll!!!!!
i just love him and i swear i would die for him!!!!
he is sooo perfect !
and of course i love chuck and blair they the sexiest copule ever!!!
p.s – ed westwick merried me(L)
completely in agreement with the last comment. havent read the books but seems they’ve completely sanitised them so the show can be broadcast earlier in the evening.
interesting how they’ve completely changed some of the relationships between characters and personalities. must be quite confusing if you’ve read the books!
i just read one book and it’s not as good as the series
and in the book there’s mentioned that aaron rose is the brother of…someone
something like that…xD
another difference is that blair’s mom is seeing cyrus from the very first novel & aaron is not an artist but a hemp obsessed vegan and he does indeed date serena but briefly. blair also has a cat named kitty-minky & constantly refers her life to classic audrey hepburn movies.
i started reading the books when i was thirteen when they first came out. i was infatuated with the novels always awaiting the next one just as i do the episodes now. once i heard they were making a show i was ecstatic. while the show is VERY different i like both series in their own right. i am now nineteen and love the show but will always be fond of the books as well.
i recommend that GG fans read the novel series, you’ll be surprised at how different it is
I am thinking about starting to read the gossip girl books, i am addicted to the show and think i should read the books that started it all. But i am having doubts as i’ve heard the books are based around nate and blairs relationship and i didn’t really like them together and i loe blair and chucks relationship, Please may someone answer my quiestion: do blair and chuck have a relationship at all?
i like the book series and the television series both, but there are times when i wish that the writers of the show would have stuck more closely with certain elements from the book. on the show, blair and nate were depicted as being together mainly because of their place in society, and the wishes of their parents, but in the books they are depicted as having a strong love, or as serena describes it at one point “that one true love”. i think that the show couldn’t really put nate and blair together again without it seeming forced at this point, and i do like chuck and blair on the show, but in the books i love nate and blair, and sometimes i wish that the show had stuck with revolving around the romance between these two like the books. i do however, really like how they made chucks character less one dimensional in the tv series.
to all of those who said they prefered the tv show (without actually reading the book) you’re definitely missing out. however, it’s pointless now to read the books if you already have the t.v. show set in your minds. i read the books first and then began watching the t.v. show and i was really disappointed…the books are much more interesting and the characters have so many more layers to them and the plot lines are much more believable than they are in the t.v. series.
and mollie, chuck and blair do not have a relationship in the book…but you grow to really like chuck and blair together since they’re the focus of the books…chuck is so incredibly different in the books…but it’s all-around better.
I enjoy both the book series and the television series. I like it that they didn’t follow every single little detail. I’m only on book number four of the Gossip Girl series and do Chuck and Blair get together like they do in the show? Because I loooove Chuck and Blair!
ok i watch the series and read the books and i love both. But i like them both for what they are–which is completely different from eachother.
Like one major difference is the characters Blair in the books is very vapid and bitchy but in the series she is more insecure and all about being Queen B. Also in the series she would never pull all the schemes she does she would just sit back watch Breakfast at tiffany’s and feel sorry for herself lol.
I like the books way better though. They are so much more real. And i hate how annoying serena is in the tv show. She is so annoying and sugary sweet nice. In the books and is totally selfish.
And i hate Serena and Dan together-so annoying. They should have made her more like the books meaning she gets bored with one boy after 5 seconds and moves on to the next.
i the only reason i love the show at all is because of Blair and Chuck. Chuck was just a jerk in the books in the series they are so cute together
i feel like they took the only three characters in the book who weren’t teetering on perfection and made them look just like everyone else. int he books, vanessa has a shaved head and dan is scruffier-not all clean-cut like he looks in the show. and jenny was supposed to be short and incredibly insecure about her big boobs. they ruined the only physically different characters.
Well i’ve just read the first novel of the series and i think it was really interesting, but as far as the bisexual chuck and harrasing and abusing women sexually chuck is really creepy. I’m glad that in the tv series he’s so mysterious and really cares for blair.
I think that the story line was changed due to the very mature content of the books and was made PG13 so teenagers would watch it.
I loved the book and now i’m going to read the others.
Can’t wait for season 3!:D, blair+chuck(:
grr i hate the way they made blair and nate’s relationship completely non existant, except from maybe at the start of series 1. also, nate is far too nice, and responsible. he’s supposed to be a stoner for gods sake! sam goes for serena, she’s so boring in the tv series, so nice and… well, not serena. BOOKS FTW!! this t.v show is totally different, it’s like it’s not even based on the books at all. seriously…. read the books! xx
I think vanessa would be a much better character if they had stuck with how the books described her: shaved head, wearing all black, kick ass attitude. in the tv series she’s kinda boring…
but overall i think i prefer the tv series (and i have read the books)
blair + chuck = perfection
xxx
Well, judging by what was edited or left out from the books (drugs, homosexuality) it seems that certain changes had to have been made to the original story to make it more “suitable” for a younger audience by today’s television standards. That raises the question though, is it ok to expose our children to a world, imaginary or not, where there are very few or fairly light consequences for outlandish and irreverant behavior? Seems like much of the dirt was scrubbed from the storyline on purpose. That’s just one man’s opinion though…thoughts?
that is fucked up homosexuality is definetly ok for all people!
wwooooowww. I am so happy i have watched only the tv series, I don’t think i would like the book series at all, the tv series is WAY more intresting.
Dan can’t be gay, or a smoker, and he and serenas relationship is one of the main reasons i watch the show.
S + D = FOREVER !!!
I agree with kiko. On every single point mentioned, I prefer the TV show’s interpretation, especially with Chuck. He seems WAY more interesting on the show as he is not so one-dimensional.
im completly in love with chuck(ed westwick) i think that hes the best acter in the whole world!!!!!!! he’s sexy as helllllllllllll!!!!!
i just love him and i swear i would die for him!!!!
he is sooo perfect !
and of course i love chuck and blair they the sexiest copule ever!!!
p.s – ed westwick merried me(L)
completely in agreement with the last comment. havent read the books but seems they’ve completely sanitised them so the show can be broadcast earlier in the evening.
interesting how they’ve completely changed some of the relationships between characters and personalities. must be quite confusing if you’ve read the books!
i just read one book and it’s not as good as the series
and in the book there’s mentioned that aaron rose is the brother of…someone
something like that…xD
another difference is that blair’s mom is seeing cyrus from the very first novel & aaron is not an artist but a hemp obsessed vegan and he does indeed date serena but briefly. blair also has a cat named kitty-minky & constantly refers her life to classic audrey hepburn movies.
i started reading the books when i was thirteen when they first came out. i was infatuated with the novels always awaiting the next one just as i do the episodes now. once i heard they were making a show i was ecstatic. while the show is VERY different i like both series in their own right. i am now nineteen and love the show but will always be fond of the books as well.
i recommend that GG fans read the novel series, you’ll be surprised at how different it is
TV SERIEEEEEES FOR SURE
I have all the books
I dont consider those two as the same story
I like both
They kept the style at least
i wonder if there will be sparks between chuck and vanessa?
in the books Nate has green eyes ,on the show he has blue eyes
I am thinking about starting to read the gossip girl books, i am addicted to the show and think i should read the books that started it all. But i am having doubts as i’ve heard the books are based around nate and blairs relationship and i didn’t really like them together and i loe blair and chucks relationship, Please may someone answer my quiestion: do blair and chuck have a relationship at all?
i meant in the book– do blair and chuck have a relationship at all in the book?
i like the book series and the television series both, but there are times when i wish that the writers of the show would have stuck more closely with certain elements from the book. on the show, blair and nate were depicted as being together mainly because of their place in society, and the wishes of their parents, but in the books they are depicted as having a strong love, or as serena describes it at one point “that one true love”. i think that the show couldn’t really put nate and blair together again without it seeming forced at this point, and i do like chuck and blair on the show, but in the books i love nate and blair, and sometimes i wish that the show had stuck with revolving around the romance between these two like the books. i do however, really like how they made chucks character less one dimensional in the tv series.
to all of those who said they prefered the tv show (without actually reading the book) you’re definitely missing out. however, it’s pointless now to read the books if you already have the t.v. show set in your minds. i read the books first and then began watching the t.v. show and i was really disappointed…the books are much more interesting and the characters have so many more layers to them and the plot lines are much more believable than they are in the t.v. series.
and mollie, chuck and blair do not have a relationship in the book…but you grow to really like chuck and blair together since they’re the focus of the books…chuck is so incredibly different in the books…but it’s all-around better.
oops, i meant you really grow to like NATE and blair together in the books.
I enjoy both the book series and the television series. I like it that they didn’t follow every single little detail. I’m only on book number four of the Gossip Girl series and do Chuck and Blair get together like they do in the show? Because I loooove Chuck and Blair!
ok i watch the series and read the books and i love both. But i like them both for what they are–which is completely different from eachother.
Like one major difference is the characters Blair in the books is very vapid and bitchy but in the series she is more insecure and all about being Queen B. Also in the series she would never pull all the schemes she does she would just sit back watch Breakfast at tiffany’s and feel sorry for herself lol.
I like the books way better though. They are so much more real. And i hate how annoying serena is in the tv show. She is so annoying and sugary sweet nice. In the books and is totally selfish.
And i hate Serena and Dan together-so annoying. They should have made her more like the books meaning she gets bored with one boy after 5 seconds and moves on to the next.
i the only reason i love the show at all is because of Blair and Chuck. Chuck was just a jerk in the books in the series they are so cute together
i feel like they took the only three characters in the book who weren’t teetering on perfection and made them look just like everyone else. int he books, vanessa has a shaved head and dan is scruffier-not all clean-cut like he looks in the show. and jenny was supposed to be short and incredibly insecure about her big boobs. they ruined the only physically different characters.
I’ve been hoping that the tv series would get better, but maybe I just need to read the books instead.
Well i’ve just read the first novel of the series and i think it was really interesting, but as far as the bisexual chuck and harrasing and abusing women sexually chuck is really creepy. I’m glad that in the tv series he’s so mysterious and really cares for blair.
I think that the story line was changed due to the very mature content of the books and was made PG13 so teenagers would watch it.
I loved the book and now i’m going to read the others.
Can’t wait for season 3!:D, blair+chuck(:
another differnce is aaron (cyrus`s son ) blair and him have a little thing where is the show him and serena date
another difference is that aaron (cyrus`s son) , him and blair hit it off , in the show he dates serena
grr i hate the way they made blair and nate’s relationship completely non existant, except from maybe at the start of series 1. also, nate is far too nice, and responsible. he’s supposed to be a stoner for gods sake! sam goes for serena, she’s so boring in the tv series, so nice and… well, not serena. BOOKS FTW!! this t.v show is totally different, it’s like it’s not even based on the books at all. seriously…. read the books!
xx
Im just wondering is the 1st book in the series of gossip girl the same as the 1st season on the television series?
it’s not the same, suzanne. oh, and blair and serena DO NOT have sexual relations with each other in the book….wikipedia was wrong.